Penalty Assessed for Violation of Iranian Transactions Regulations
In reviewing those general factors, OFAC determined that Zurigo had knowledge or reason to know that the goods were destined for Iran. Furthermore, although Zurigo has not been a subject of an OFAC enforcement action the last five years, they also did not have an OFAC compliance program in place at the time of the violation. Finally, in making their determination OFAC determined that the goods which Zurigo attempted to export would have been eligible for an OFAC license had Zurigo applied for one, although OFAC did not indicate which goods Zurigo attempted to export.
Despite some favorable factors on their side, Zurigo still received a fine that was only $168.00 less than the value of the transaction they attempted. It was interesting to see that Zurigo did not received any mitigation of penalty for cooperation, which is usually provided if the company cooperates during the investigation phase.
I’m not sure what happened in Zurigo’s case, however, I often advise being as forthcoming with OFAC as possible. They have a lot of discretion in what types of actions they take and judicial review of their decisions is limited. As such, the cards are heavily stacked in their favor during the enforcement process.
The author of this blog is Erich Ferrari, an attorney specializing in OFAC matters. If you have any questions please contact him at 202-280-6370 or ferrari@ferrari-legal.com.