• April 30, 2024

The Only Comprehensive Resource on U.S. Economic Sanctions

OFAC SDN List Screening Clarifications

Spread the love

Last week the United States Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) provided some guidance on their expectationswhen it comes to the screening of Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs) against the SDN List. Readers of this blog may recall that U.S. persons should screen the names of the parties they engage in transactions with to ensure they are not transacting with a party that is on the SDN List. There can be significant penalties for those U.S. persons who do engage in such transactions.

The primary thrust of OFAC’s announcement was focused on how U.S. persons conducting OFAC screenings should handle the appearance of “weak aliases” (AKAs). To anyone who has ever even glanced at the OFAC SDN List, it becomes very clear that not only is the name of the designated party placed on the list, but also a variety of spellings of that name and/or any affiliated nicknames of that party. These are what constitute weak aliases.

According to OFAC, their regulations do not explicitly require any particular screening process, however, they DO NOT expect persons to screen for weak aliases, but do expect that weak aliases be used to determine whether a match based on other information is accurate. Moreover, OFAC clearly stated:

“if (i) the only sanctions referenced in the transaction is a weak AKA, (ii) the person involved in the processing had no other reason to know that the transaction involved an SDN or was otherwise in violation of U.S. law, and (iii) the person maintains a rigorous risk-based compliance program, OFAC will not issue a civil penalty against an individual or entity for processing such a transaction.”

This guidance from OFAC is certainly appreciated and should put some parties to ease. If a strong compliance program is instituted and there is nothing other than a weak AKA associated with the transaction, U.S. persons can sleep somewhat better knowing they will not be receiving a penalty (although I am surprised OFAC openly admitted that fact). However, this is not an open door to become lax with one’s compliance program or to stop screening. U.S. persons need to remain as diligent as ever in their screening process and in their compliance with OFAC regulations, as the consequences of failing to do so far outweigh the benefit of neglecting such processes.

The author of this blog is Erich Ferrari, an attorney specializing in OFAC matters. If you have any questions please contact him at 202-280-6370 or ferrari@ferrari-legal.com.

Bookmark and Share

Erich Ferrari

As the Founder and Principal of Ferrari & Associates, P.C., Mr. Ferrari represents U.S. and foreign corporations, financial institutions, exporters, insurers, as well as private individuals in trade compliance, regulatory licensing matters, and federal investigations and prosecutions. He frequently represents clients before the United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the United States Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), and in federal courts around the country. With over 12 years of experience in national security law, exports control, and U.S. economic sanctions, he counsels across industry sectors representing parties in a wide range of matters from ensuring compliance to defending against federal prosecutions and pursuing federal appeals.

1 Comments

  • Good article… Could you please cite the original OFAC text?

Comments are closed.

Related post